This site may earn chapter commissions from the links on this page. Terms of use.

GTX1070Ti

When Nvidia launched the GTX 1070 and 1080 back in May 2022, information technology decisively re-established itself as the upper-midrange market place, while extending its atomic number 82 at the top of the graphics stack. Save for the launch of the new 1080 Ti and a pocket-sized bump to the GTX 1080'southward RAM clocks before this year, that's where the market stayed until August, when AMD'due south Vega 56 took a pocket-sized atomic number 82 over the 1070 and Vega 64 landed only below the 1080 (albeit at much higher power). Nvidia obviously wants to shut the gap betwixt itself and AMD at the GTX 1070'southward price point, and the new GTX 1070 Ti is designed to practise just that.

AMD-vs-NV-Chart

The 1070 Ti is a neat split betwixt the GTX 1080 and the GTX 1070. Fill rates on the 1070 and 1070 Ti can actually exceed the 1080 (depending on your card'southward maximum frequency), since some 1070 and 1070 Ti cards actually clock higher than the 1080. All three cards have 64 ROPS, only the 1080 does maintain a noted retentivity bandwidth advantage. At the same time, the touch on of this on games is smaller than you might expect, since Pascal GPUs are historically pretty retentivity efficient. GDDR5X is only used on the 1080 and 1080 Ti; the 1070 and 1070 Ti even so use normal GDDR5. Pricing, once more, splits the difference between the 1070 and 1080.

Nosotros've rounded upwards reviews from Anandtech, Reckoner Shopper, PCGamer, and Tech Study. Hither'due south how they pause downwards: In that location'southward general agreement, on all sides, that this new GPU closes the gap between the GTX 1070 and the Vega 56, though obviously this is yet somewhat game-dependent. There are games where the 1070 Ti pulls ahead significantly and games where Vega 56 still leads by a narrow margin.

This brings upward a betoken we want to address in a bit more detail. It is not unusual for GPU reviews to vary between websites depending on a variety of factors, including testbed configurations, the specific games tested, which API the tests are run in, and the detail levels inside the games themselves. With that said, the gap betwixt Vega 56 and the 1070 Ti is much wider in some reviews than others. Computer Shopper shows the GTX 1070 Ti and the GTX 1070 chirapsia Vega 56 in virtually every test. Anandtech reports that Vega 56 is ~8 percent faster than the GTX 1070, but that AMD's lower-stop Vega is edged out by roughly 5 per centum by the 1070 Ti. PCGamer's results (you can encounter the amass graph below) are between Anandtech and CS, with Vega 56 slightly behind the GTX 1070 and the GTX 1070 Ti well alee.

GTX1070Ti-PCG

Paradigm past PCGamer

Tech Report has published a sneak peak of both its 99th-percentile scatter plot and its boilerplate fps/$. We've gone with the scatterplot to offer a different performance perspective (click through to see the average fps results), but TR's results look a chip more than like Anandtech's in both cases. Over again, the Vega 56 is well ahead of the GTX 1070, but the GTX 1070 Ti is alee of Vega 56.

I don't bring upwards these differences to throw shade on any of the sites in question–if I thought they were producing bad data, I wouldn't include them hither–but as a pertinent example of how GPU comparisons can change depending on which tests you use. Testbed configuration is usually a relatively small variable, provided nothing is egregiously misconfigured, simply detail settings tin can shift game results fairly significantly, even without enabling optimizations like GameWorks that are specifically tuned to run well on Nvidia GPUs. AMD maintains an overall compute workload advantage in OpenCL 2.0 (according to Anandtech), but other tests, similar Folding, still favor Nvidia GPUs.

The GTX family unit continues to win on ability consumption as well, though how much this matters varies by the gamer and by the base of operations cooler on the GPU. Desktop owners tend to treat power consumption as a proxy for both noise and oestrus (which is a pretty reasonable manner to treat it, in my opinion), but while Vega never hits the 95C temperatures that Hawaii was known for, its coolers however tend to be louder than their Nvidia counterparts (third-party cards based on Vega are few and far between thus far).

The major practical cistron is going to come down to price. Cryptocurrency mining has driven the cost of GPUs upwardly dramatically, and AMD cards take been hit harder past this than their Nvidia equivalents. Right now, Vega 56 and 64 availability actually looks pretty adept, simply this tin can change depending on how the cryptocurrency market shifts from week to week. And of grade we aren't seeing many ODM cards in market still that aren't based on AMD's own reference design, so that could play a gene in option every bit well.

The lesser line is this: Vega 56 remains a good counter to the GTX 1070, the GTX 1070 Ti now offers a small advantage for another $lxx compared with the GTX 1070's MSRP, and Vega 64 nonetheless isn't a keen lucifer-up against the GTX 1080. If you're already running a Pascal GPU, the 1070 Ti probably isn't worth the upgrade, but gamers back on the 9xx or earlier cards would find a dramatic performance improvement.